A Conceptual Culture Model for Design Science Research

Thomas Richter


The aim of design science research (DSR) in information systems is the user-centred creation of IT-artifacts with regard to specific social environments. For culture research in the field, which is necessary for a proper localization of IT-artifacts, models and research approaches from social sciences usually are adopted. Descriptive dimension-based culture models most commonly are applied for this purpose, which assume culture being a national phenomenon and tend to reduce it to basic values. Such models are useful for investigations in behavioural culture research because it aims to isolate, describe and explain culture-specific attitudes and characteristics within a selected society. In contrast, with the necessity to deduce concrete decisions for artifact-design, research results from DSR need to go beyond this aim. As hypothesis, this contribution generally questions the applicability of such generic culture dimensions’ models for DSR and focuses on their theoretical foundation, which goes back to Hofstede’s conceptual Onion Model of Culture. The herein applied literature-based analysis confirms the hypothesis. Consequently, an alternative conceptual culture model is being introduced and discussed as theoretical foundation for culture research in DSR.



Culture, conceptual culture model, design science research.

Full Text:



Adler NJ, (2002). International dimensions of organizational behavior. 4th Edition, Thompson South-Western, Cincinnati.

Ailon G, (2008). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Culture’s consequences in a value test of its own design. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 885-904.

Alexander BC, (1997). Ritual and current studies of ritual: Overview. In: SD Glazier (Ed.), Anthropology of religion: A Handbook, 139-160. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Ali RM., Tretiakov A, Crump B, (2009). Models of national culture in IS research. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 246-256. Melbourne: Monash University.

Baskerville R, (2008). What design science is not. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3): 441-443.

Beer B, (2003). Ethos; Ethnie; Kultur. In: B Beer, H Fischer (Eds.), Ethnologie. Einführung und Überblick, 53-72. Berlin: Reimer.

Bell CM, (1953). Ritual theory, ritual practice. New York: Oxford University Press. (herein used the 2009 published paperback edition)

Bowie F, (2000). The anthropology of religion: An introduction. Oxford: MPG Books Ltd.

Bowlby J, (1995). Bindung: Historische Wurzeln, theoretische Konzepte und klinische Relevanz. In G Spangler and P Zimmermann (Eds.), Die Bindungstheorie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Boyd R, Richerson PJ, (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

Braudel F, (1992). Schriften zur Geschichte I: Gesellschaften und Zeitstrukturen. Stuttgart: Klett Cotta.

Bruk-Lee V, Khoury HA, Nixon AE, Goh A, Spector PE, (2009). Replicating and extending past personali-ty/job satisfaction meta-analyses. Human Performance, 22(2): 156-189.

Campbell J, (1949). The hero with a thousand faces, 3rd Edition. Novato, California: New World Library.

Cohen J, Margalit A, (1970). The role of inductive reasoning in the interpretation of metaphor. Synthese, 21(3/4): 469-487.

Church TA, Katigbak MS, (1988). The emic strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in a non-western culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(2): 140-163.

Derr CB and Laurent A (1989). The internal and external career: A theoretical and cross-cultural perspec-tive. In: MB Arthur, DT Hall, BS Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of Career Theory, 454-471, Cambridge: University Press.

Douglas I, Liu Z, (2011). Global usability. London: Springer.

Drechsler A, (2013). Design science as design of social systems - Implications for information systems re-search. Journal of Information Technology, Theory and Application, 14(4): 5-26.

Ehn BE, Löfgren O, (2009). Ethnography in the marketplace. Culture Unbound, 1(1): 31-49.

Fang T, (2011). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25-50.

Fögen MT, (1999). Ritual und Rechtsfindung. In: C Caduff, J Pfaff-Czarnecka (Eds.), Rituale heute: Theorien - Kontroversen – Entwürfe: 149-164, Berlin: Reimer.

Frank U, Schauer C, Wigand R, (2008). Different paths of development of two information systems communities: A comparative study based on peer interviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22(1): 391-412.

Gagliardi P, (1986). The creation and change of organizational cultures: A conceptual framework. Organ-ization Studies, 7(2): 117-134.

Geertz C, (1957). Ethos, world-view and the analysis of sacred symbols. The Antioch Review, 17(4): 421-437.

Gelfand MJ, Erez ME, Aycan Z, (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psy-chology, 2007/58: 479-514.

Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL, (2007). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1225-1244.

Gluckman M, (1954). Rituals of rebellion in South-East Africa. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Goeltz DR, (2014). Globalization and hypercompetition – Drivers, linkages, and industry differences. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, June 2014/8. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/141856.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2014.

Goodman N, (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols, 2nd Edition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Gregor S, Hevner AR, (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2): 337-355.

Grossmann KE, Grossmann K, Zimmermann P, Cassidy J, (1999). A wider view of attachment and explo-ration: Stability and change during the years of immaturity. In: PR Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of at-tachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 760-78, New York: Guilford Press.

Guss E, Miller MC, (2008). Ethics and generational differences: Interplay between values and ethical business decisions. White Paper: http://www.shrm.org. Accessed 12. October 2014.

Haire M, Ghiselli EE, Porter LW, (1966). Managerial thinking: An international study. New York: Wiley.

Hall ET, Hall MR, (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.

Hoecklin L, (1994). Managing cultural differences: Strategies for competitive advantage. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc.

Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S, (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quar-terly, 28(1): 75-105.

Hofstede G, (1980, 2001). Culture's consequences – international differences in work related values. London: Newbury Park (herein used the 2nd edition from 2001, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

Hofstede G, Bond MH, (1988). The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Or-ganizational Dynamics, 16: 4-21.

Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Ohayav DD, Sanders G, (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A Qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2): 286-316.

Hofstede G, (1999). Problems remain, but theories will change: The universal and the specific in 21st-century global management. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1): 34-44.

Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M, (first ed. 1980, herein used 2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, 3rd Edition. USA: McGraw-Hill Publishers.

House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The Globe Study of 62 societies. London: Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Hummel T, Zander E, (2005). Interkulturelles Management. In: T HUMMEL (Ed.), Schriften zum Interkulturellen Management, Band 10. Munich: Reiner Hampp Verlag.

Inglehart R, Wetzel C, (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democra-cy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2): 551-567.

Jones ML, (2007). Hofstede – Culturally questionable? In: A Gupta, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 Ox-ford Business & Economics Conference, Oxford: Oxford University, http://www.gcbe.us/2007_OBEC/data/confcd.htm. Accessed 12 October 2014.

Jung CG (1958). The collected works of C. G. Jung. NY: Pantheon, Bullington Series 11.

Katz P, Katz FE, (1977). Symbols as charters in culture change: The Jewish case. Anthropos, 72(3-4): 486-497.

Karahanna E, Evaristo JR, Srite M, (2006). Levels of culture and individual behaviour: An integrative per-spective. Advanced Topics in Global Information Management, 5(1): 30-50.

Kirkman BL, Lowe KB, Gibson CB, (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: a review of em-pirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, 37(3): 285-320.

Kogut B, Singh H (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432.

Kluckhohn FR, (1953). Universal categories of culture. In: AL Kroeber, (Ed.), Anthropology today, 507-523, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Koester J, Olebe M, (1988). The behavioural assessment scale for intercultural communication effec-tiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12(3): 233-246.

Kølvraa C, (2012). The father on display: The house of Jean Monnet and the construction of European identity. Culture Unbound, 4/2012: 747-765.

Köppel P, (2002). Kulturerfassungsansätze und ihre Integration in interkulturelle Trainings. Trier Beiträge zur gegenwartsbezogenen Ethnologie. Trier: Fokus Kultur.

Kuhn MH, McPartland R, (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Re-view, 19(1): 68-76.

Lai VS, Wong BK, (2003). The moderating effect of local environment on a foreign affiliate's global IS strategy-effectiveness relationship. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 50(3): 352-361.

Leach-López MA, Jack EP, (2014). Hofstede’s values – LOC: job satisfaction effect in the USA, Mexico, Korea, and Hong Kong. Journal of International Business Management, 8/2014, http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/121237.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2014.

Leidner D, Kayworth T, (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MISQ, 30(2): 357-399.

Leung K, Ang S, (2009). Culture, organizations, and institutions: an integrative review. In: RS Bhagat and RM Steers, (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Culture, Organizations, and Work, 23-45, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lord R, (2003, reprint, orig. 1956). The hero: A study in tradition, myth, and drama. New York: Dover Publications Inc.

Lutzinger S, (2010). Die Sicht der Anderen. Cologne: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH.

Massey M, (1979). The people puzzle. Michigan: University of Michigan.

Mauss M, (1990). Die Gabe: Form und Funktion des Austauschs in archaischen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt, London: Suhrkamp.

McSweeney B, (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A tri-umph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1): 89-118.

Michaels A, (1999). „Le rituel pour le rituel“ oder wie sinnlos sind Rituale? In: C Caduff and J Pfaff-Czarnecka (Eds.), Rituale heute: Theorien - Kontroversen – Entwürfe, 23-48, Berlin: Reimer.

Morris C, (1956). Varieties of human value. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Müller H-P, (1996). Kulturelle Gliederung der Entwicklungsländer. In: MÜLLER H-P (Ed.), Weltsystem und kulturelles Erbe, 81-137, Raimer Verlag, Berlin.

Ng SI, Lee JA, Soutar GN, (2007). Are Hofstede's and Schwartz's value frameworks congruent? Interna-tional Marketing Review, 24(2): 164-180.

Norman D, (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

Nunamaker Jr JF, Briggs RO, (2012). Toward a broader vision for information systems. ACM Transitions of Management Information Systems, 2(4): 20:1–20:12.

Oeser E, (1990). Evolution und Selbstkonstruktion des Rechts: Rechtsphilosophie als Entwicklungstheorie der praktischen Vernunft. Wien, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.

Oetting ER, (1993). Orthogonal cultural identification: Theoretical links between cultural identification and substance use. In: MR de la Rosa, J-L R Andrados, (Eds.), Drug Abuse Among Minority Youth: Methodological Issues and Recent Research Advances, 32-56, Rockville, MD: National Inst. on Drug Abuse (DHHS/PHS).

Osgood C, (1951). Culture: Its empirical and non-empirical character. Southwestern Journal of Anthro-pology, 7(2): 202-214.

Pelto P, (1968). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5(1): 37-40.

Pless NM, Maak T (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2): 129-147.

Rafaeli A, Worline M, (2000). Symbols in organizational culture. In: NM Ashkanasi, CPM Wilderom, MF Peterson, (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, 71-84, Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.

Rokeach M, (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Ruch FL, Zimbardo PG, (1974). Lehrbuch der Psychologie: eine Einführung für Studenten der Psychologie, Medizin und Pädagogik. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

Schein EH, (1985, 2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Sossey-Bass. (herein, the 4th Edition from 2010 was used)

Schnyder AB, (1988). Unternehmenskultur. Die Entwicklung eines Unternehmungskultur- Modells unter Berücksichtigung ethnologischer Erkenntnisse und deren Anwendung auf die Innovations-Thematik. Europäische Hochschulschriften, Serie V, Band 987. Bern, Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.

Scholz C, (2000). Personalmanagement. 5th Edition, Munich: Vahlen.

Schröter S, (2004). Rituals of rebellion. A theory reconsidered. In: J Kreinath, C Hartung, A Deschner, (Eds.), The Dynamics of changing rituals: The Transformation of Religious Rituals within Their Social and Cultural Context, Toronto Studies in Religion 29, 41-58, New York: Peter Lang.

Schwartz SH, Bilsky W, (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Exten-sion and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5): 878-891.

Schwartz SH, (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism. New cultural dimensions of values. In: U Kim, HC Triandis, C Kagitcibasi, S Choi, G Yoon, (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism, theory, method and applications, 85-119, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Schwartz SH, (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1): 23-47.

Singleton M, Reyna SP, (1995). Science – artichoke or onion? The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1(3): 628-631.

Smith PB, (2006). When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: the GLOBE and Hofstede projects. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 915-921.

Soderberg A-M, Holden N, (2002). Rethinking cross-cultural management in a globalizing business word. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 23(1): 101-121.

Straub DW, Loch K, Evaristo R, Karahanna E, Strite M, (2002). Need for a theory-based individual (versus universal) conceptualization and measurement of culture. In: F Tan, (Ed.), Advanced Topics in Global Information Management, Vol. 2, 39-48, Hershey: Idea Group.

Tarras V, Steel P, (2009). Beyond Hofstede: Challenging the ten commandments of cross-cultural re-search. In C Nakata, (Ed.), Beyond Hofstede: Culture frameworks for global marketing and man-agement, 40-60, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tarras V, Rowney J, Steel PDG, (2009). Half a century of measuring culture: Review of approaches, chal-lenges, and limitations based on the analysis of 121 instruments for quantifying culture. Journal of International Management, 15(4): 357-373.

Tajfel H, Turner JC, (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: S Worchel and WG Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations, 7-24, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Thiel M, (1979). Symbole. In: M Lurker, Wörterbuch der Symbolik. Stuttgart: Kröner. http://www.symbolforschung.org/Symbole.html. Accessed 01 November 2014.

Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner C, (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversi-ty in business. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.

Tsui AS, Nifadkar SS, Olu AY, (2007). Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behaviour research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426-478.

Turner V, (1967). The forest of symbols. USA: Cornell University Press.

Turner V, (1968). The drums of affliction: A study of religious processes among the Ndembu of Zambia. Oxford: Clarendon Publishing.

Turner V, (1969a). Forms of symbolic action: Introduction. In: RE Spencer, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1969 annual spring meeting of the American ethnological society, 3-25, Seattle: American Ethnological Society.

Turner V, (1969b). The ritual process – Structure and anti-structure. New Brunswick: Transaction Pub-lishers. (herein used the 2nd edition from 2009).

Wallace AF, (1966). Religion: An anthropological view. New York: Random House.

Westwood RG, Everett JE, (1987). Culture’s consequences: A methodology for comparative manage-ment studies in South-East Asia? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 4(3): 187-202.

White LA, (1959). The science of culture: A study of man and civilization. New York: Grove Press.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v6i3.927


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Thomas Richter


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to support@thejournalofbusiness.org. Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add  this domain thejournalofbusiness.org in your email safe list.

International journal of business and social research (Print)
ISSN 2164-2540

International journal of business and social research (Online)
ISSN 2164-2559

[International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR) previously published by MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, MD, USA. From February 2018 this journal is published by the LAR Center Press, OR, USA]