Strategic Audit and Ownership Strategy
Keywords:Corporate governance, ownership strategy, strategic audit, text analytic.
AbstractIn the new global economy, ownership has become a central issue for organizational performance. Ownership strategy is where corporate governance meets strategic management. Highlighting a knowledge gap in the field of corporate governance, the author is asking the central research question: “how to develop an ownership strategy?” The main purpose of this paper is to answer this original question and develop a better understanding about ownership strategies. Theoretically there is evidence to indicate that there is a link between strategic audit and ownership strategy. Analyzing firm cases from Estonia allows concluding that the strategic audit is useful for developing systemically ownership strategies, which in turn could be a realistic alternative for complete contracts. The use of strategic audits gives the business owner an opportunity to analyze his own actions and behavior, learning, managing knowledge, and finally clearly expressing his will in the form of an ownership strategy.
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.
Andreadakis, S. (2011). Towards an enlightened shareholder value: The tension between shareholder and stakeholder models in modern corporate governance. Paper presented at the. 8th workshop on corporate governance. Brussels: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management (EIASM).
Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers. Organization Science, 20(2), 410–421.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
Collin, S.-O. (2000). Ownership strategies in Swedish municipal corporations. In L. Montanheiro, & M. Linehan (Eds.), Public and Private Sector Partnerships: The Enabling Mix (pp. 173–190). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
Collin, S.-O. (2001). Ownership strategy: A holistic and praxis oriented view on corporate governance. Department of Business Studies. Kristianstad: Kristianstad University College.
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional and experience influences. In P. W. Beamish, A. Delios, & S. Makino (Eds.), Japanese subsidiaries in the new global economy (pp. 175–204). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Demsetz, H. (1991). The theory of the firm revisited. In O. E. Williamson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm (pp. 159–178). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited". Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.
Hine, D., & Carson, D. (Eds.). (2007). Innovative methodologies in enterprise research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Studies, 3(3), 383–397.
Leximancer. (2014, July 20). Retrieved from http://info.leximancer.com
Luoma, T. (2011). Implementation of an ownership strategy. EIASM 8th Workshop on Corporate Goverance. Brussels: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.
Tricker, B. (2009). Corporate governance: Principles, policies and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wahl, M. F. (2006). The ownership structure of corporations: Owners classification & typology. EBS Review, 21(1), 94–103.
Wahl, M. F. (2011). Kapitaliühingute lõppomanike alusväärtuste ja tahte uurimine ning omanikkonna tüpoloogia konstrueerimine [Basic human values & will of capital companies’ ultimate owners and construction of an ownership typology]. Tallinn University of Technology, Chair of Organization and Management. Tallinn: TUT Press.
Wahl, M. F. (2012). Ownership typology: Four basic human values & will based ideal types. Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, 4(2), 61–83.
Wheelen, T. L., & Hunger, J. D. (2012). Strategic management and business policy: Toward global sustainability (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zetterberg, H. L. (1997). The study of values. In R. Swedberg, & E. Uddhammar (Eds.), Sociological Endeavor. Selected Writings (pp. 191–219). Stockholm: City University Press.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).