Effects of Funding Sources on Access to Quality Higher Education in Public Universities in Kenya: A Case Study
Keywords:Higher education, human capital, public university, quality education.
AbstractIn the last two decades, Kenya has witnessed an exponential growth of students’ enrolment in its public universities and an oscillatory government funding in these institutions precipitating quality concerns by employers on the skills of the graduates to meet industry needs. In education finance, the sources of funds and the size of the resources are key determinants of quality education. The objective of the study was to determine the relationship between various funding sources and access to quality education in Kenya public universities using a case approach. The data collection instruments used were an interview guide, a focus group discussion guide, a student’s survey questionnaire and secondary document analysis. Data was collected from October to December 2014 in the case university from a sample population of 10 top university management staff, 36 heads of department (HoDs) and 400 undergraduate students. The study employed the education production function as a basic model of the study. The validity of the data collection instruments was established through scrutiny by thesis supervisors and the reliability test of the students’ questionnaire returned a cronbach alpha of 0.88. F-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used with aid of the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 2.0.The conclusion of the study was that, the sources of funds had a positive effect on quality though the results were not significant, while government capitation, tuition and other sources of funds were significantly important for the access of quality of education in the institution (P =0.30, P = 0.018, P = 0.000). The study recommended the adoption of performance based funding to enhance quality in higher education.
Aghion, P. M., Dewatripont, C., Hoxby, A., Mas-Coell & Sapir, A. (2008). “Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European universities,” Technical Report, Bruegel blueprint.
Al-Samarrai, S. (2002). “Achieving eduaction for all: How much does money matter?” IDS working paper 175, Brghton: Institute of Development Studies.
Altbach, P. (2007). The log of mass higher education. Tradition and transition: The International Imperative in Higher Education, Rotterdam, Netherland, Sense Publishers 3-22. P.G Altabach (ed.).
Ankomah, Y. (2005). Research priorities in relation to leadership and management for change. A paper presented at the national consultative workshop on educational quality implementation at Accra Ghana.
Baum, S. & Payea, K. (2010). Education Pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. New York: The College Board.
Becker, G.S, (1964) Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bowen, H. (1980). The cost of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per student and how much they should spend. Carnegie Council on Policy studies in Higher Education. pg 18-20.
Cheung, B., (2003). higher education financing policy: Mechanisms and Effects.
Cheng, Y.C., & Tam, V.M. (1997). Multi models of quantity in education. Quality assurance in education, 5 (1), 22 – 31. http://doi.org/10.1108/09684889710156558.
Cheps, IOE & Technolopis. (2009). Progress in higher education reform across Europe – Funding Reform (Vol. 1) (Vol 1, pp 1-24)
Colcough, C. & Lewin, K. (1993). Educating all the children: Strategies for primary schooling in the south. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dare, A. (2005). Indicators of quality. A paper presented at the National consultative workshop on Education Quality Implementation n low income countries: Ghana.
Geiger, R & Heller, D. (2011). Financial trends in higher education in United States: Center for the study of Higher Education. Available at http: www.ed.psv. Educ/c.she/working papers/wpg236.
Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M. & Tiongson, E. (1999). ‘Does Higher Government Spending Buy Better Results in Education and Health Care?’, Working paper No. 99/21, International Monetary Fund, February.
Hanushek, E. (2003). The failure of input based schooling policies, Economic journal 113 (1) F64-F98.
Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). ‘Schooling, labour-force quality, and the growth of nations’, American Economic Review, Vol 5: 1184-208.
Harnish, T. (2011). Performance-Based Funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. A Higher Education Policy Brief.
Johnstone, D, (2003). Cost-sharing in higher education. Tuition, Financial Assistance, and Accessibility. Czech sociological Review, 39(3), 351-374
Jongbloed, B. (2010). Funding higher education: A view across Europe. Brussels, ESMU
Kelso, R. (2008). Measuring under graduating students perceptions of service quality in higher education. PhD. thesis, Available at http://www.scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/328
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research acivities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Krueger, A. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. The Economic Journal, 113, F34- F63.
Lee, J. W., & Barrow, R. J. (1997). Schooling quality in a cross section of countries, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lindsay, C. (1976). Theory of government enterprise. Journal of political Economy 84 10 61-1077.
Marginson, S. (1999). Diversity and convergence in Australia Higher Education. Australia Universities Review.1
McMahon, W. (1999). Education and development: Measuring the social benefits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Magoha, G.A.O. (2005, June). Memorandum presented by the University of Nairobi to the Public Universities Inspection Board. University of Nairobi: Nairobi.
McPherson, M., & Schapiro, M. (1990). does student aid affect college enrollment? New Evidence on a Persistent Controversy. The American Economic Review, Vol 81, No 1, 309-318
Merriam-Webster Online. Available at: http://www.m-w.com/ Accessed November, 2014
Orodho, J.A. (2012). Techniques of writing research proposals and reports in education and social sciences. Nairobi: Kanezja Publishers.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251430
Pfeiffer, J. (2005). Developing resource dependence theory: How theory is affected by its environment. Great Minds in Management: the Process of Theory Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Pfeiffer, J, & G.R Salancik. (1978). “The external control of organizations: a resource dependence approach. “New York: Harper and Row.
Psacharapoulos G. (1985). Return to education: A further international update and implications, Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), pp. 583-604.
Riechi, A.R.O. (2012). Revenue diversification in Kenya public Universities and implication for efficiency and equity: An analysis of education finance in Africa contex: Kenyatta University. Retrieved from: http://www.etd-library.ku.ac.ke
Salim, J., & Hauptman, A.M. (2006). Innovation in tertiary education financing & comparative evaluation of allocation mechanisms. World Bank Washington D.C, USA.P.45-49.
Schomburg, H. & Teichler, U. (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe: Results of graduate surveys from twelve countries. Springer Verlag.
Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51 (March 1961); 1-17
Schultz, T. P. (1996). ‘Accounting for public expenditure on education: an international panel study’, Yale Economic Growth Center Working Paper, New Haven: Yale University.
Smith, A. (1993). An Inquiry into the causes of the wealth of nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
UNESCO. (2004): Education for all. The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2012). The Impact of economic crisis on higher education. Bangkok: UNESCO.
Woessmann, L. (2000). ‘New evidence on the missing resource-performance link in education’, working paper 1051, Kiel Institute of World Economics.
World Bank. (2004). Facilitating Investment in the Global education Market. Washington DC: World Bank.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).