Challenges and Obstacles of e-Government Streamlining: A Case Study

Authors

  • Anupam K. Nath Elizabeth City State University
  • Debjani Kanjilal Elizabeth City State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i5.504

Keywords:

e-Government, information technology, collaborative effort, efficient service delivery

Abstract

e-Government streamlining has been a challenge since its inception in the domain of e-business. Business organizations face challenges while trying to collaborate with partners through the use of information technology in order to ensure efficient delivery of services. One of the major reasons for these inefficient services has been political bureaucracies among government organizations. To meet this challenge, a transparent and networked environment is required where government organizations can effectively partner with other relevant organizations. Using a case study analysis, we intend to identify not just the challenges in government organizations while providing services which require collaborative effort, but also the obstacles in adopting new technology for collaboration. We believe that the outcome of our research could provide a generalized guideline for government agencies where there is need for digital collaboration. Our findings will thus help government organizations to address the challenges in digital collaboration, and also help them implement new technology successfully to ensure efficient delivery of services.

Author Biographies

  • Anupam K. Nath, Elizabeth City State University

    Assistant Professor

    School of Business & Economics

  • Debjani Kanjilal, Elizabeth City State University

    Assistant Professor

    School of Business & Economics

References

Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch.

Andrulis, J., & Hirning, K. (2002). Collaborative Government Services: Building for the Future. IBM Institute for Business Value; 2002.

Avgerou, C. (1993). Information Systems for Development Planning. International Journal of Information Management, 13, 260-273.

Chen, M. (2003). Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and web services standards for e-business systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 259-279.

Cuddy, I. (2003). New moves for European e-Government. Retrieved from http://www.egovmonitor.com/newsletter/yzdqasd86/talrln02.html

Fan, B. (2013). The impact of information technology capability, information sharing and government process redesign on the operational performance of emergency incident management systems. Information Research, 18, 1-18.

Gant, J.P., & Gant, D.B. (2001). Web Portal Functionality and State Government E-Services. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii.

GAO, United States General Accounting Office, (2003). Public Accounting Firms: Required Study on the Potential Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation.

Harris, S.C., & Sutton, R.I. (1986). Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 5-30.

Heeks, R. (2000). Reinventing Government in the Information Age. Routledge Press, London.

Janita, I., & Chong, W.K. (2013). Barriers of B2B e-Business Adoption in Indonesian SMEs: A Literature Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 571-578.

Lee, A.S. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13, 33–50.

Leder, G. (2008). Web 2.0 tools save time. Retrieved from http://www.onwallstreet.com

Madzova, V., Sajnoski, K., & Davcev, L. (2013). e-Government As An Efficient Tool Towards Good Governance (Trends And Comparative Analysis Throughout Worldwide Regions And Within West Balkan Countries. Balkan Social Science Review, 1, 157-174.

Nath, A. (2012). Web 2.0 Technologies for Effective Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Analysis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA

Nath, A., Singh, R., & Iyer, L. (2009). Web 2.0: Capabilities, Business Value and Strategic Practice. Proceedings of Association for Information Systems Conference.

Navarra, D., & Cornford, T. (2003). A Policy Making View of E-Government. Innovations in Public Governance. AMCIS 2003 Proceedings. Paper No. 103.

Osimo, D., & Centeno, C. (2007). The elephant and the mice: will web 2.0 change public services? e-Challenges.

Robey, D., Anderson, C., & Raymond, B. (2013). Information Technology, Materiality, and Organizational Change: A Professional Odyssey. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 379-398.

Sarker, S, & Lee, A. (2002). Using a Positivist Case Research Methodology to Test Three Competing Theories-in-Use of Business Process Redesign. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2.

Shrage, M. (1990). Shared Mînds. Random House, New York.

Stephen, C. (2004). Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet: Two Case Studies of Online Consultations. Information, Communication and Society, 7, 1-22.

Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weerakkody V., Bauer S. & Choudrie, J. (2006). E-Government: The Need for Effective Process Management in the Public Sector. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Wilson (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research - Design And Methods, Second Edition. Sage Publications, London

Downloads

Published

2014-05-20

Issue

Section

Article