The Effect of Alliance Image on the Relationship between Consumer Innovativeness and New Product Adoption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i4.447Keywords:
Consumer Innovativeness, Alliance Image, New Product AdoptionAbstract
The adopter classification system suggests that an innovating firm should research the characteristics and behaviors that are specific to consumer innovators and direct communications specifically to them (Kotler 1994). Increasingly, in the face of stiff competition, many companies are strategically forming alliances to create new products to appeal to innovators and non-innovators. An alliance is a cooperative form of organizational structure that centers on core competencies. This creates very important theoretical issues and managerial concerns regarding new product development. These issues affect marketing management, strategies and planning, decision-making processes, market segmentation, target markets and product positioning. Strategic alliances form to obtain enabling technologies that can shorten the new product development process (Shilling and Hill 1998). In addition, alliances are growing strategic phenomenon allowing organizations to focus on their specific areas of expertise and leverage their competitive advantage. Spekman and Sawhney (1990) noted that the motivation for companies to enter into alliances is to obtain strategic advantages. This paper links the concepts of new product adoption, alliance image and consumer innovativeness. There is evidence that alliance image between strong companies moderates the relationship between consumer innovativeness and the likelihood of new product adoption.
References
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411-23.
-----, Hakansson, H. & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 1-15.
Areni, C. S., Duhan, D. F. & Kieker, P. (1999). Point-of-purchase displays, product organization, and brand purchase likelihoods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 27 (4), 428-41.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley, Inc.
Boulding, W. & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (June), 111-23.
-----, Morgan, R., & Staelin, R. (1997) Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (February), 164.
Boyd, T. C. & Mason, G. H. (1999). The link between attractiveness of ‘extrabrand’ attributes and the adoption of innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (3), 306-19.
Bucklin, L. P., & Sengupta, S. (1993). Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. Journal of Marketing, (April), 32-46.
Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44, 1378-88.
Chan, P. S. & Heide, D. (1993). Strategic alliances in technology: Key competitive weapon. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 58 (4), 9-22.
Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64-73.
Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115-26.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand and store information on buyers’ product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 307-319.
Das, S., Pradyot K. S., & Sengupta, S. (1998), Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 27-41.
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1999). Managing risks in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive, 13 (4), 50-62.
Dickerson, M. D. & Gentry J. W. (1983). Characteristics of adopters and nonadopters of home computers. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 225-34.
Dowling, G. R. (1986). Managing your corporate images. Industrial Marketing Management, 15 (May), 109-115.
---- (1986). Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement. Psychology and Marketing, 3 (Fall), 193-210.
Dowling, M. E., Keering, W. D., Carlin B. A., & Wisnieski, J. (1996). Multifaceted relationships under coopetition. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5 (2), 155-167.
Feldman, L. P. & Armstrong, G. M. (1975). Identifying buyers of a major automotive innovation. Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 47-53.
Festervand, T. A., Meinert D. B., & Vitell S. J.. Older adults’ attitudes toward and adoption of personal computers and computer-based lifestyles assistance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10 (Spring), 13-25.
Foxall, G. R. (1995). Cognitive styles of consumer initiators. Technovation, 15 (June), 269-88.
Gatignon, H. & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (March), 849-867.
Gerbing, D. W. & Anderson, J. C. (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186-92.
Goldsmith, R. E. & Hofacker, C. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10 (3), 209-21.
-----, Freiden, J. B. & Eastman J. K. (1995). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation, 15 (December), 601-612.
Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (December), 283-94.
Jaccard, J. & Wan, C. K. (1996), LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-114, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Joreskog, K. & Sorbom D. (1996), LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-9.
Koh, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1991). Joint venture formations and stock reactions: An assessment in the information Technology Sector. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (4), 869-892.
Kotler, P. (1994), Marketing Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lim, H. & Park, J. (2013) The effects of national culture and cosmopolitanism on consumers’ adoption of innovation: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25 (1), 16-28.
Lynn, G. S. & Akgun, A. E. (1998). Innovation strategies under uncertainty: A contingency approach for new product development. Engineering Management Journal, 10 (3), 11-17.
MacCullum, R. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107-20.
Martineau, P. (1958). Sharper focus for the corporate image. Harvard Business Review, 36 (Nov./Dec.), 49-58.
Midgley, D. F. & Dowling G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 ( March), 229-242.
Mitchell, A. (1998). Form alliances and make your marketing spend go farther. Management Today, February, 74-75.
Moskowitz, D. S. (1982). Coherence and cross-situational generality in personality: A new analysis of old problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (October), 754-68.
Mowen, J. C. & Minor, M. (1998), Consumer Behavior, 5th ed., New Jersey: Prentiss-Hall, Inc.
-----, Christia, J. & Spears, N. (1998). Consumer innovativeness: A general consumer trait or a product category specific trait? American Marketing Association Educators’ Summer Conference.
Park, C. W., Jun, S., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Composite branding alliances: An investigation of extension and feedback effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(November), 453-466.
Rao, A. R., Qu, L. & Ruekert, R. W. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), 258-268.
----- & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. Sloan Management Review, (Fall), 87-97.
Rogers, Everett (1962), Diffusion of innovations, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
----- (1983), Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed., New York: Free Press.
Robertson, T. S. & Kennedy, J. N. (1968). Prediction of consumer innovators: Application of multiple discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (February), 64-9.
----- & Myers, J. H. (1969). Personality correlates of opinion leadership and innovative buying. Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (May), 164-8.
Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C., Jr., (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 1-19.
Shilling, M. A. & Hill, C. W. (1998). Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Executive, 12 (3), 67-81.
Shimp, T. A. (1997). Advertising and Promotion and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications, 5th Ed., The Dryden Press, Harcourt Inc.: Orlando, 198.
Spekman, R. E. & Sawhney, K. (1990). Toward a conceptual understanding of the antecedents of strategic alliances. Report No. 90-114 (August). Cambridge, MA; Marketing Science Institute.
Steenkamp, J. E., ter Hofstede, F. & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 55-69.
Taylor, J. W. (1977). A striking characteristic of innovators. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (February), 104-7.
van Rijnsoever, F. J & Carolina. C. (2011). Extending consumer categorization based on innovativeness: Intentions and technology clusters in consumer electronics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62 (8), 1604-1613.
Venkatraman, M. P. & Price, L. L. (1990). Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 20 (June), 293-315.
Williamson, O (1989). Transaction cost economics. Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, 347-370, New York: Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
