Towards a Cohesive Theory of Cohesion

Authors

  • Janet McLeod School of Psychology, Deakin University
  • Kathryn von Treuer Deakin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v3i12.338

Keywords:

Cohesion, Cumulative research program, Performance

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that group cohesion is strongly related to performance. This may be based on the notion that better cohesion leads to the sharing of group goals. However, empirical and meta-analytic studies have been unable to consistently demonstrate a relationship between cohesion and performance. Partially, this problem could be attributed to the disagreement on the precise definition of cohesion and its components. Further, when the cohesion construct is evaluated under Cohen’s Cumulative Research Program (CRP), it is surprisingly found to belong to the category of early-to-intermediate stage of theory development. Therefore, a thorough re-examination of the cohesion construct is essential to advance our understanding of the cohesion-productivity relationship. We propose a qualitative approach because it will help establish the definitions, enable us to better test our theories about cohesion and its moderators, and provide insights into how best to enlist cohesion to improve team performance.

References

Andrews MC, Kacmar KM, Blakely GL, Bucklew NS, 2008. Group cohesion as an enhancement to the Justice- Affective commitment relationship. Group Organization Management, 33: 736-755.

Aoyagi MW, Cox RH, McGuire RT, 2008. Organizational citizenship behavior in sport: Relationships with leadership, team cohesion, and athlete satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20: 25-41.

Back KW, 1951. Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 9 - 23.

Banki S, 2010. Is a good deed constructive regardless of intent? Organization citizenship behavior, motive, and group outcomes. Small Group Research, 41: 354-375.

Barrett A, Piatek C, Korber S, Padula C. 2009. Lessons learned from a lateral violence and team-building intervention. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 33: 342-351.

Beal DJ, Cohen RR, Burke MJ, McLendon CL. 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 989 - 1004.

Bell RC, 2006. A note on the correlation of elements in Repertory Grids: How to, and why. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19: 273 - 279.

Bollen KA, Hoyle RH, 1990. Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69: 479 - 504.

Budman SH, Soldz S, Demby A, Davis M, Merry J, 1993. What is cohesiveness?: An empirical examination. Small Group Research, 24: 199-216.

Carless SA, 2000. Reply to Carron and Brawley. Small Group Research, 31: 107 - 118.

Carless SA, De Paola C, 2000. The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31: 71 - 88.

Carron AV, 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4: 123 - 138.

Carron AV, Brawley LR, 2000. Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31: 89 - 106.

Carron AV, Widmeyer WN, Brawley LR, 1985. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7: 244 - 266.

Casey-Campbell M, Martens ML, 2009. Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 223-246.

Chen C-HV, Tang Y-Y, 2009. Interdependence and organizational citizenship behaviour: Exploring the mediating effect of group cohesion in multilevel analysis. The Journal of Psychology, 143: 625-640.

Chin WW, Salisbury WD, Pearson AW, Stollak MJ, 1999. Perceived cohesion in small groups: Adopting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small group setting. Small Group Research, 30: 751-766.

Cohen BP, 1989. Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and method (2 ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall inc.

Cohen S, Bailey DE, 1997. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.

Crino N, Djokvucic I, 2010. Cohesion to the group and its association with attendance and early treatment response in an adult day-hospital program for eating disorders: A preliminary clinical investigation. Clinical Psychologist, 14: 54-61.

De Backer M, Boen F, Ceux T, De Cuyper B, Høigaard R, Callens F, et al., 2011. Do perceived justice and need support of the coach predict team identification and cohesion? Testing their relative importance among top volleyball and handball players in Belgium and Norway. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12: 192-201.

Dobbins GH, Zaccaro SJ, 1986. The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. Group and Organization Studies, 11: 203-219.

Drescher S, Burlingame G, Fuhriman A, 1985. Cohesion: An odyssey in empirical understanding. Small Group Behaviour, 16: 3 - 30.

Estabrooks PA, Carron AV, 2000. The physical activity group environment questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of cohesion in exercise classes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4: 230-243.

Evans NJ, Jarvis PA, 1980. Group cohesion: A review and reevaluation. Small Group Behaviour, 11: 359 - 370.

Eys MA, Loughead T, Bray SR, Carron AV, 2009. Development of a Cohesion Questionnaire for Youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31: 390-408.

Festinger L, 1950. Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57: 271 - 282.

Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K, 1950. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Frank JD, 1957. Some determinants, manifestations and effects of cohesiveness in therapy groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 7: 53-63.

Fransella F, Bell RC, Bannister D, 2004. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique (2nd ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Friedkin NE, 2004. Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 409-425.

Goodman PS, Ravlin E, Schminke M, 1987. Understanding groups in organizations. Research in organizational behaviour, 9: 121-173.

Gross E, 1954. Primary functions of the small group. American Journal of Sociology, 60: 24-29.

Gross N, Martin WE, 1952. On group cohesiveness. The American Journal of Sociology, 57: 546-564.

Guzzo RA, Dickson MW, 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.

Harrison DA, Mohammed S, McGrath JE, Florey AT, Vanderstoep S, 2003. Time matters in task performance: Effects of member familiarity, entertainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56: 633-669.

Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO, Howard MJ, 2009. Unit-level volutary turnover rates and customer service quality: Implications of Group cohesiveness, newcomer concentration and size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1068-1075.

Hornsey MJ, Dwyer L, Oei TPS, Dingle GA, 2009. Group processes and outcomes in group psychotherapy: Is it time to let go of 'cohesiveness'? International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 59: 267-278.

Hu L-T, Bentler PM, 1999. Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1-55.

Kelly GA, 1955/1991. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton (Reprinted by Routledge, London).

Kidwell RE, Mossholder KW, Bennett N, 1997. Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behaviour: A multilevel analysis using work groups and individuals. Journal of Management, 23: 775-779.

Kirshner BJ, Dies RR, Brown RA, 1978. Effects of experimental manipulation of self-disclosure cohesiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46: 1171-1177.

Klassen RM, Krawchuk LL, 2009. Collective motivation beliefs of early adolescents working in small groups. Journal of School Psychology, 47: 101-120.

Klein HJ, Mulvey PW, 1995. Two investigations of the relationships among group goals, goal commitment, cohesion, and performance. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 61: 44-53.

Lott AJ, Lott BE, 1965. Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64: 259-309.

Loughead TM, Patterson MM, Carron AV, 2008. The impact of fitness leader behavior and cohesion on an exerciser's affective state. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6: 53-68.

Marcos FML, Miguel PAS, Oliva DS, Calvo TG, 2010. Interactive effects of team cohesion on perceived efficacy in semi-professional sport. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9: 320-325.

May AM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Korstjens I, van Weert E, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, van den Borne B. et al., 2008. The effect of group cohesion on rehabilitation outcome in cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 17: 917-925.

Mudrack PE, 1989. Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion? Small Group Behaviour, 20: 37 - 49.

Mullen B, Copper C, 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115: 210 - 227.

Mullen B, Driskell JE, Salas E, 1998. Meta-analysis and the study of group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2: 213- 229.

Ogrodniczuk JS, Piper WE, Joyce AS, 2006. Treatment compliance among patients with personality disorders receiving group psychotherapy: What are the roles of interpersonal distress and cohesion. Psychiatry, 69: 249-261.

Olson DH, Russell CS, Sprenkle DH, 1983. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: IV. Theoretical update. Family Process, 22: 69-83.

Piper WE, Marrache M, Lacroix R, Richardsen AM, Jones BD, 1983. Cohesion as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36: 93-108.

Price JL, Mueller CB, 1986. Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

Reber AS, Reber E, 2001. The penguin dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). London: Pengin Books.

Salisbury W, Parent M, Chin W, 2008. Robbing Peter to pay Paul: The differential effect of GSS restrictiveness on process satisfaction and group cohesion. Group Decision & Negotiation, 17: 303-320.

Salo M, Siebold GL, 2008. Variables impacting peer group cohesion in the Finnish conscript. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 36: 1-18.

Schachter S, 1951. Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 190-207.

Schutz RW, Eom HJ, Smoll FL, Smith RE, 1994. Examination of the factorial validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65: 226-236.

Seashore SE, 1954. Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, Universtiy of Michigan.

Shiue YC, Chiu CM, Chang CC, 2010. Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 768-777.

Stewart V, Stewart A, 1981. Business applications of the repertory grid. London: McGraw-Hill.

Tziner A, 1982. Differentiating effects of group cohesiveness types: A clarifying overview. Social Behaviour and Personality, 10: 227 - 239.

Van Maanen J, 1979. Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 520-526.

von Treuer K, Fuller-Tyzkiewicz M, Atkinson B, 2010. A factor-analytic study exploring the factors of co-worker cohesion. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Organisational Psychology, 3: 42-53.

Warkentin ME, Sayeed L, Hightower R. 1997. Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28: 975-996.

Widmeyer WN, Bray SR, Carron AV, 1985. The measurement of cohesion in work teams: The group environment questionnaire. London, Ontario: Sports Dynamics.

Yukelson D, Weinberg R, Jackson A, 1984. A mutidimensional group cohesion instrument for intercollegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6: 103-177.

Zenaida RR, Fernando R, Pierre T, 2003. Youth integration and social capital: An analysis of the Canadian general social surveys on time use. Youth & Society, 35: 158-182.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-26

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 12 (2013): December

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).