Understanding the Impact of Board Structure on Firm Performance: A Comprehensive Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v10i1.1271Keywords:
Firm Performance, Board Composition, Board Structure, Independent DirectorsAbstract
There have been numerous studies which examined the impact of board structure on firm performance. However, all these studies have failed to provide any form of consensus on how board structure or board composition impact firm performance. Hence, we are left asking is there an effect on firm performance? The missing link therefore, is the absence of a comprehensive review of the literature which addresses the issue. The objective of this paper is to provide a thorough analysis of previous studies with the aim of providing some direction to and closure of the debate regarding the effect of board structure on firm performance. The results of the literature review showed that there are compelling arguments on both side to either support or refute the hypotheses that board structure impacts firm performance. Hence, paper provides a new direction for that researcher need take in an attempt to answer this decade-old question.
References
Abdullah, S. (2004). Board composition, CEO duality and performance among Malaysian
listed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in
Society, 4(4), 47-61.
Adams, R., and Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards, Journal of Finance, 62, 217-
Anderson, C., and Anthony, N. (1986). The new corporate directors. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Anderson, C.R., and Reeb, M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S & P
firms, Administrative Science Quarterly,49, 209-237.
Agrawal, A., and Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanism to control agency
problems between managers and shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis, 31: 337-398.
Aguilera, R.U. and Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance world-wide: What is
the trigger? Organizational Studies, 25:415-443.
Aran,J.D., and Cowen, S. (1983). Information for corporate directors: The role of the board in
the management process (# 83146). Institute of Management Accountants.
Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., and Maseda, A. (2010). Outsiders on the board of directors and firm
performance: Evidence from Spanish non-listed family firms. Journal of Family Strategy,
, 236-245.
Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W. and Van Gils, A. (2008). Boards of directors in family firms: A
generational perspective, Small Business Economics, 31, 163-180.
Baysinger, B., and Butler, H. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors:
Performance effects of changes in board composition, Journal of Law Economics, and
Organization, 1 (1), 101-124.
Baysinger, B. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1990). The composition of board of directors and strategy
control: effects on corporate strategy, Academy of Management Review, 15, 17-87.
Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relationship between the board of director
composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71, 443-465.
Bennedsen, M., Kongsted, H.C., and Nielson, K.M. (2008). The casual effect of board size in
the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32:
-1109.
Berg, S., and Smith, S.K. (1978). CEO and board chairman: a quantitative study of dual vs
unitary board leadership. Directors and Boards, 3(1), 34-39.
Bhagat, S. and Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term
performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27, 231-274.
Brennan, N. (2006). Boards of directors and firm performance: Is there an expectation gap?
Corporate Governance: An International Review14(6), 577-593.
Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L., and Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and
chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3 (3), 189-220.
Bryd, J.W., and Hickman, K.A. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence
from tender offers bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 195-221.
Chahine, S., and Filatotchev, (2011). The effects of corporate governance and audit and non-
audit fees on IPO value. The British Accounting Review, 43, 155-172.
Chaganti, R.S., Mahajan, V., and Sharman, S. (1985). Corporate board size, composition
and corporate failures in retailing industries. Journal of Management Studies, 22(4),
-417.
Chrisman, J., Kellermanns, W., Chan, K., and Liano, K. (2010). Intellectual foundations of
current research in family business: An identification of review of 25 influential
articles, Family Business Review, 23, 9-26.
Clendenin, W.D. (1972). Company presidents look at the board of directors, California
Management Review, Spring: 60-66.
Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. and Cannella, A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue
and data, Academy of Management Review, 28: 371-82.
Daily, C.M., and Dalton, D.R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: the impact of
board composition and structure, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603- 1617.
Dalton, D., and Dalton, C. (2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research
: CEO duality, board composition and financial performance, Journal of Management, 37
(2), 404-411.
Dalton. D.R., Hitt, M.A., Certo, S.T., and Dalton, C.M. (2008). The fundamental agency
problem and its mitigation: Independence equity and the market for corporate control.
Annals of the Academy Management (1), 1-64.
Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A. and Johnson, J.L. (1988). Meta-analytic reviews of
board composition, leadership structure and firm performance. Strategic Management
Journal, 19, 269-290.
Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Johnson, J.L., and Ellstrand, A.E. (1999). Number of directors and
financial performance: A meta-analysis, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42.
-686.
Dayton, K.N. (1984). Corporate governance-the other side of the coin. Harvard Business
Review, 62, (1), 34-37.
Demb, A. and Neubauer, F. (1992). The corporate board, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
De Andres, P., Azofra, V., and Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size,
composition, functioning and effectiveness, Corporate Governance, 13(2), 197-210.
Dehaene, A., De Vuyst, V., and Ooghe, H. (2001). Corporate governance performance and
board structure in Belgian companies, Long Range Planning, 34, 383-398.
Denis, D. K. and McConnell, J.J. (2003). International corporate governance, Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1-36.
Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-
analytic review, Journal of Management, 31: 424-44.
Dey, E., Engel, E., Liu, X. (2009). Determinants and implications of board leadership structure.
University of Chicago Booth School Working Paper,09 – 23.
Donaldsson, L. and Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance
and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, (1), 49-64.
Dobrzynski, J.H. (1991). One hat too many. Business Week, 18, 124.
Dulewicz, V., and Herbert, P. (2004). Does the composition and practice of boards of directors
bear any relationship to the performance of their companies? Corporate Governance:
An International Review 12(3): 263-280.
Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., and Wells, M.T. (1998). Larger boards size and decreasing firm
value in small firms, Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35-54.
Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 15 (6) 1203-1214.
Enrione, A., Mazza, C. and Zerboni, F. (2006). Institutionalizing codes of governance,
American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 961-73.
Evans, C.R. and Dion, K.L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis,
Small Group Research 22,175-186.
Faleye, O. (2007). Does one hat fir all? The case of corporate leadership structure. Journal of
Management and Governance, 11: 239-259.
Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy,
(2), 288-307.
Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law
Economics, 26, 301-325.
Fiegener, M., Brown, M., Dreux, R. and Dennis, W.J. (2000). The adoption of outside boards by
small private US firms, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 291-309.
Finkelstein, S., and D’Aveni, R.A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edge sword: how boards of
directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of
Management Journal, 37, 1079-1108.
Forbes, D.P., and Milliken, F. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding
board of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review,
:489-505.
Fried, V.H., Bruton, G.D. and Hisrich, R.D. (1998). Strategy and the board of directors in
venture capital-backed firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 493-503.
Giovannini, R. (2014). Corporate governance, family ownership and performance. Journal of
Management and Governance, 14, 145-166.
Gracia-Olalla, M., and Gracia Ramos, R. (2010). Family ownership, structure and board of
directors effectiveness: Empirical evidence from European firms. 9th Annual IFERA
Conference.
Garcia-Ramos, R., and Garcia-Olalla, M. (2011). Board characteristics and firm performance in
Public founder-and non-founder-led family business, Journal of Family Business Strategy
, 220-231.
Goel, S., Mazzola, P. Phan, H., Piper, M. and Zachary, R. (2012). Strategy, ownership,
governance and socio-psychological perspectives on family business from around the
world, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3, 54-65.
Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. and Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on
strategic change, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 241-250.
Goodwin, J.D., and Seow, J.L. (2000). Corporate governance in Singapore: perceptions of
investors, directors, and auditors. Accounting and Business Review, 7(1), 39-68.
Golden, B.R. and Zajac, E. J. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power =
strategy change, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1087-111.
Hampel, R. (1998). Committee on corporate governance: Final report. Gee Publishing, London.
Harris, M., and Raviv, A. (2008). A theory of board control and size, The Review of Financial
Studies, 21, 1797-1831.
Heller, J.R. and Milton, F. (1972). The board of directors: Legalistic anachronism or vital force,
California Management Review, Spring: 24-30.
Heracleous, L. (2001). What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational
performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9; 165- 73.
Hermalin, B. and Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined
institution: A survey of the economic literature, FRBNY Economic Policy Review 9,
-26.
Hermalin, B. and Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentive
on firm performance. Financial Management, 20 (4), 101-112.
Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the effectiveness of non-executive directors. Department of Trade
and Industry, London.
Hoskisson, R.E., Hilt, M.A., Johnson, R.A., and Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The
effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate
innovation strategies, Academy of Management Journal, 45: 697-716.
Hossain, M., Prevost, A.K., and Roa, R.P. (2001). Corporate governance in New Zealand: The
effect of the 1993 Companies Act on the relation between board composition and firm
performance, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9, 119-145.
Hsu, H. and Wu, C. (2014). Board composition, grey directors and corporate failure in the UK,
The British Accounting Review, 46, 215-227.
Hunther, J. (1997). An empirical test of the effects of board size on firm efficiency, Economics
Letters, 54, 259-264.
Ingley, C. and Van Der Walt, N. (2005). Do board processes influence director and board
performance? Statutory and performance implications, Corporate Governance: An
International Review,13: 632-59.
Iyengar, R., and Zampelli, E.M. (2009). Self-selection, endogeneity, and relationship between
CEO duality and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 1092-1112.
Jackling, B., and Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s
top companies, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509.
Jaskiewicz, P., and Klein, S. (2007). The impact of goal alignment on board composition and
board size in family business. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1080-1089.
Jensen, M., C. and Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic
preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm, Strategic Management
Journal, 25: 507-24.
Jensen, M.C. (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control
systems, Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, N. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost
and structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
John, K. and Senbet, L.W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness, Journal of
Finance, 22, 371-403.
Johnson, J.L., Daily, C.M. and Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and
research agenda, Journal of Management, 22: 409-38.
Judge, W. Q. and Zeithaml, C.P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board
Involvement in the strategic decision process, Academy of Management Journal, 35:
-94.
Kiel, G.C. and Nicholson, G.J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the
Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189-205.
Kula, V. (2005). The impact of the roles, structure, strategy and process of boards on firm
performance: evidence from Turkey. Corporate Governance, 13(2).
Lane, S., Astrachan, J., Keyt, A., and McMillian, K. (2006). Guidelines for family business
boards of directors, Family Business Review, 19, 147-167.
Levy, (1981). Reforming board reform. Harvard Business Review, 166-172.
Mace, M. (1976). Attracting new directors, Harvard Business Review, September-October: 46-
Machin, J.L.H. and Wilson, L.S. (1979). Closing the gap between planning and controls, Long
Range Planning, 12: 16-33.
Mak, Y.T., and Li, Y. (2001). Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure:
Evidence from Singapore, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 235-256.
Mak, Y.T. and Roush, M.L. (2000). Factors affecting the characteristics of boards of directors:
An empirical study of New Zealand initial public offering firms, Journal of Business
Research, 47, 147-159.
Mallette, P., and Fowler, K.L. (1992). Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the
adoption of “poison pills”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, (5), 1010-1035.
Mashayekhi, B. and Bazaz, M. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance in Iran,
Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 4(2) 156-172.
McKnight, P., Mira, S. (2003). Corporate Governance mechanisms, agency costs and firm
performance in UK firms http://ssrn.com/abstract
Miller, D., and Friesen, P. (1997). Strategy-making in context: The empirical archetypes.
Journal of Management Studies, 1(4), 253-280.
Millstein, I. (1991). The limits of corporate power: existing constraints on the exercise of
corporate discretion. New York: MacMillan.
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., and Zona, F. (2009). Making board effective: An empirical
examination of board task performance, British Journal of Management, 20, 55-74.
Monks, R. and Minow, N. (2008). Corporate governance, Wiley, London.
Nicholson, G.J., and Kiel, G.C. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of
Three theories of corporate governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review
, 585-608.
O’Connell, U., and Cramer, N. (2010). The relationship between firm performance and board
characteristics in Ireland, European Management Journal, 28, 387-399.
Patton, A., and Baker, J.C. (1987). Why won’t directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Review
, 10-18.
Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P., Zattoni, M., & Volberda, H. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution
to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An
International Review, 17(3), 292-306.
Raheja, C.G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, (2), 283-306.
Rechner, P.L. (1989). Corporate governance: fact or fiction? Business Horizon, 32 (4), 11-15.
Rechner, P.L., and Dalton, D.R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A
longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (5), 1010-1035.
Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., and Keller, P. (2006). Board characteristics and involvement in the
strategic decision-making: Evidence from Swiss companies, Journal of Management
Studies, 43: 1201-26.
Setia-Atmaja, L., Haman, J., and Tanewski, G. (2011). The role of board independence in
mitigating agency problems in Australian family firms. The Accounting Review, 43,
-246.
Sciascia, S., and Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management:
Exploring nonlinear effects on performance, Family Business Review, 21 (4), 331-345.
Sheridan, L., Jones. E. and Marston, C. (2006). Corporate governance codes and the supply of
corporate information in the UK, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12:
-99.
Shivdasani, A. (1993). Board composition, ownership structure and hostile take-overs. Journal of
Accounting and Economics, 16, 167-198.
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.W (1997). A survey of corporate governance, Journal of Finance,
(2), 737-783.
Singh, M. and Davidson, W.N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate
Governance mechanisms, Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 793-816.
Solomon, L.D. (1993). On the frontier of capitalism: Implementation of humanomics by
modern public held corporation: a critical assessment. Washington and Lee Law
Review, 50(4), 1625-1671.
Stoeberl, P.A., and Sherony, B.C. (1985). Board efficiency and effectiveness. Handbook for
Corporate Directors, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Uhlaner, L., Wright, M., and Huse, M. (2007). Private firms and corporate governance: An
integrated economic and management perspective, Small Business Economics, 29,
-241.
Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance, Journal of Financial
Economics, 53, 113-142.
Vafeas, N. and Theodorou, E. (1998). The relationship between board structure and firm
performance in the UK. British Accounting Review, 30: 383-407.
Vance, J.O. (1979). The care and feeding of the board of directors, California Management
Review, Summer: 29-34.
Voordeckers, W., Van Gils, A., and Van dan Heuvel, J. (2007). Board composition in small and
medium-sized family firms, Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 137-156.
Voordeckers, W. (2006). Board roles in small and medium-size family business: Performance
and importance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 467-485.
Weisbach, M (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20,
-460.
Xie, B., Davidson, W.N. and Datalt, P.J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate
governance: the role of the board and audit committee, Journal of Corporate Finance,
, 295-316.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuations of companies with a small board of directors.
Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-211.
Zahra, S.A. and Pearce, J. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A
review and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15: 291-334.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).