Ukraine and The IMF: An Uneasy Cooperation

Authors

  • Fyodor Kushnirsky Temple University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v4i7.572

Keywords:

Conditionality, Economic Growth, Gas and Heating Tariffs, IMF, Ukraine

Abstract

The paper discusses the role of current political developments in Ukraine, the history of Ukraine-IMF cooperation, the estimation of the effect of IMF financing on Ukraine’s economic growth, and the role of the IMF conditionality in controversial issues of increasing flexibility of the national currency, raising gas and heating tariffs, and implementing broad-based economic and governance reforms. Based on results of the estimation of a modified production function, the hypothesis of a positive effect of IMF credit on Ukraine’s economic growth has been rejected. The analysis of specific requirements attached to a 2014 standby loan, all of which were accepted by the new government of Ukraine, shows that they will drastically reduce standards of living. Moreover, the government will have to perform magic by reducing the state budget deficit, on the one hand, and significantly boosting subsidies to the needy to compensate for the rising cost of municipal services, on the other hand. The ups and downs in Ukraine-IMF cooperation demonstrate that the Fund’s means of enforcement of conditionality contracts are quite limited.

Author Biography

  • Fyodor Kushnirsky, Temple University

    Department of Economics, Professor 

     

References

Banaian, K. (1999). The Ukrainian Economy since Independence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Gilman, M. (2002). Russia’s Challenges in the 1990s. Retrieved from the website: http://www.washprofile.org.

IMF (2013). Ukraine: 2013 Article IV Consultation and First Post-Program Monitoring-Staff Report. Washington, DC: December 2.

Koshovyi, D. (2000). One can borrow not only from the IMF. Galyts’ky Kontrakty, 36.

Kushnirsky, F. (2001). A Modification of the Production Function for Transition Economies Reflecting the Role of Institutional Factors. Comparative Economic Studies, 43, 1.

Odling-Smee, J. (2004). The IMF and Russia in the 1990s. Retrieved from the website: http://www.imf.org.

Remiga (2011). UN Development Program Ukraine. Kyiv: Ukraine.

Rozhen, A. (2002). The IMF Yoke? The Ukrainian 3.

Sharov, O. (2002). Ukraina ta IMF: U poshukakh vtrachenogo chasu. Visnyk NBU, September.

Skarshevskii, V. (2001). Taking Care of Ourselves. Biznes, February 5.

Stone, R. (2002). Lending Credibility.The International Monetary Fund and the Post-Communist Transition.

Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Van Zon, H. (2002). IMF policy towards Ukraine. Paper presented at the BASEES Conference, UK: Cambridge, 6-8 April.

Transition Reports 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1999. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-25

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 7 (2014): July

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).