The Impact of Brand Personality and Students’ Self-Concept on Brand Engagement

Stephen Banahene


The objective of this study is to investigate how brand personality and customers’ ‘self’ affects brand engagement. This has become necessary because the focus of most research into brands has often neglected how brand personality and customers’ ‘self’ can be harnessed to achieve brand engagement. This study used Aaker’s brand personality, Keller’s brand engagement, and Sprott et. al. self-concept measurement scales. The research methodology includes the following steps: adaptation of the measurement scales to suit the research context, assessment of reliability and validity of dimensions, and test of goodness-of-fit of model. In all 252 valid responses out of 302 questionnaires distributed were used for the study. The research found that brand personality and customers’ ‘self-concept’ have positive effect on brand engagement. Sincerity has negative relationship with brand engagement and self-concept whiles hedonism has negative relationship with self-concept only. Competence, sophistication and excitement dimensions have significant effects on customers’ self-concept and brand engagement. Sincerity and hedonism also have negative effects on self-concept and brand engagement. Competence, sophistication and excitement can be used as differentiate strategy by Private Universities to deal with the growing competition in Ghana. The findings suggest that Private Universities can differentiate themselves by developing brand personality that is competent and exciting, whereby they can successfully engaged their customers. The authors’ investigations also suggest that self-concept can be measured by splitting Sprott et al measurement scale into two (self-congruence and value-congruence). In the same way, brand engagement can be measured by splitting Keller’s measurement scale into two (identification and ambassador dimensions) for theoretical insight. In addition, hedonism has been identified as a useful measure of brand personality but not clear with faith-based Private Universities’ brand personality. Private Universities’ differentiation strategy should be based on competence, sophistication and excitement.


Brand Personality, Brand Engagement, Hedonism, Self-Concept, Value-Congruence.

Full Text:



Aaker, J. L., (199). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34: 347−356

Aaker, J. L., (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36: 45−57.

Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D.W., (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

Ang, S. H., and Lim, E. A. C., (2006). The influence of metaphors and product type on brand personality perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 35(2): 39−53.

Austin, J. R., J. A., Siguaw, and Mattila, A.S., (2003). A Re-Examination of the Generalizability of the Aaker Brand Personality Measurement Framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing 11 (2): 77–92.

Azoulay, A., and Kapferer, J. N., (2003). Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Brand Management, 11: 143−155.

Bagozzi, P. R., and Yi, Y., (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1): 8–34.

Berry, L. L. (2000). Cultivating service and brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1): 128-37

Byrne, B. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basis Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., and Guido, G., (2001). Brand Personality: How to Make the Metaphor Fit?. Journal of Economic Psychology 22: 377–395.

Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook M.B., (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing 65 (April): 81–93.

Chernatony, L., and Drury, S. (2004). Identifying and sustaining services brands’ values. Journal of Marketing Communications, 10 (2): 73-93.

Diamantopoulos, A., Smith, G.,and Grime, I., (2005). The Impact of Brand Extensions on Brand Personality: Experimental Evidence. European Journal of Marketing 39 (1/2): 129–149.

Dramanu B.Y., and Balarabe (2013). Relationship between academic self-concept and academic performance of Junior High School students in Ghana. European Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, No. 34: 93-104.

Geuens, M., Weijters, B., and Wulf, K.D. (2009). A new measure of brand personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 26: 97-107.

Ghazvini, S.D., (2011). Relationship between academic self-concept and academic performance in high school students. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences Vol. 15: 1034-1039.

Goldsmith, R.E and Goldsmith, E.B., (2012). Brand personality and brand engagement. American Journal of Management, Vol. 12(1): 11-20.

Gwirayi P., and Shumba, A., (2007). Students’ self-concept and academic achievement in Zimbabwe: A preliminary study. Journal of Psychology in Africa, Vol. 17, Issue 1-2: 119-122.

Hair Jr. F. J., Black, C. W., Babin, J. B. and Anderson, E. R., (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7th Edition). Edinburgh Gata, Harlow: Pearson.

Keller, K. L., (2003). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (2nd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

McCrae, R.R., and Costa, P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 81-90.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.

Seimiene, E., and Kamarauskaite, E., (2014). Effect of brand elements on brand personality perception. Social and Behavioural Science 156: 429-434.

Sprott, D., Czellar, S., and Spangenberg, E., (2009). The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale. Journal of Marketing Research: February 2009, Vol. 46, No. 1: 92-104.

Steinman, R. B., (2012). Brand Personality, Brand Transgression and consumer behavior. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 2 (1): 76-83

Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in Practice: getting started with a SIMPLIS approach. New York: Springer.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 STEPHEN BANAHENE


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add  this domain in your email safe list.

International journal of business and social research (Print)
ISSN 2164-2540

International journal of business and social research (Online)
ISSN 2164-2559